designed... to supersede collective bargaining - to repudiate any making of long-term agreements, to spring demand after demand upon employuers, to compel every workamn to join the Union, avowedly with the view of building up the Trade Union as a dominant force. The spasm of industrial 'insurrectionism' was [only] adruptly stopped by the outbreak of the war.
If we can detect a barely concleaed relief from the Webbs in that quote at the ending of the unrest, it was nothing compared to the relief in Westminster and the offices of employers everywhere else. Others understood exactly what had taken place, the Irish radical trade unionist Jim Larkin commented that "Labour has lost its old humility and its respectful finger touching its cap." Still others quoted by Ralph Darlington thought the movement was heading in a very radical direction. George Dangerfield saidit "took a revoutionary course and might have reached a revolutionary conclusion."
One of the great strengths, and most enjoyable aspects to this book are Darlington's detailed accounts of the strikes, and those involved. From transport to docksand sewing machine manufacturers to motor cab drivers and tailors and tailoresses and groups as diverse as Cornish clay workers and furniture makers. Tens of thousands of men and women went out on strike. On occasion the strikes were massive and quickly won, on others they were small and slow. But the "diversity of struggles" was huge. One example will suffice.
In December 1911 in the Vale of Leven, West Dunbartonshire, 2,000 women went on strike at the United Turkey Red Combine dye company. On the first day 7,000 people blocked the gates and shut the works down. Their banners, as they marched through the town read, "White Slaves, Vale of Leven, No Surrender". Their partial victory on Christmas Day saw recognition of the two (male and female) unions and a weekly pay rise of 1 shilling for men and 6 pence for women. This, it should be noted, was a sell out by the mens union which reneged on the plan for equal pay rises for men and women. But the real step forward perhaps was that the unions quickly merged, with the Amalgamated Society of Dyers accepting a merger from the National Federation of Women Workers branch.
The NFWW itself had been founded by Mary Macarthur in 1906, it grew to 20,000 when war broke out. In fact, the rapid growth of trade unions and the emergence of new unions was a key consequence of the strike wave.
Darlington's account stresses the breadth of the struggle. But he also draws out how new groups were being brought into the conflict. As the example above shows, he has an excellent focus on women's trade unions, strikes and political struggles. There is also a detailed look at the surprising wave of strikes by schoolchildren. Here I simply must include the acount from Manchester when school strikers came out, and "appointed pickets who, labelled with papers pinned to their caps bearing the wod 'picket' marched in a body to the Holland Street municipal school to induce... a sympathetic strike... the strikers... having on the way secured sticks which they brandished fiercely." Others brandished their toy pistols.
Sympathy strikes among school children was a tactic clearly learnt from watching the other strikes. Solidarity walkouts and the picketing out of other workplaces was one of the most powerful weapons that the workers had, and whole towns were brought to a halt by the tactic. These were rarely violent, in fact:
Strikers invariably endeavoured to engage in peaceful dialogue, reasoning and persuasion with those workers who refuesed to join strikes and undertood to cross pickets lines. Even contemporary hostile press reports concerned with the problem of alleged 'intimidation' frequently let slip that the act of respecting picket lines was often done voluntarily. The culture of respecting picket lines, combined with the wider degree of solidarity generated by strikes, was at least as important in building trade union power as the more dramtic large-scle confrontation, with other workers sometimes influenced and swayed by the pickets, even if highly reluctantly.
What was the cause of the revolt? One answer is poverty and inequality which had reached enormous levels in the pre-War period. In 1910 ten percent of the population owned 92 percent of the wealth. But it was more than this. According to one study by George Askwith of the Board of Trade, a great cause of discontent was the "flamboyant lifestyle" of the wealthy, contrasted with workers' poverty. Changes in British society were also having an impact, mass education was, according to Darlington, "sharpening critical faculties and encouraging a rising standard of expectation". These factors were combing to end a situation where workers "knew their place" and going further, the strikes reflected the desire "to achieve a greater amount of economic equality... [and] demands for for shorter working hourse, more pay and more power, both over industry and in the government of the country."
Pertinent to readers today one other important factor was the "widespread perceived failure of the Labour Party the ineffectiveness of Parliament". According to Darlington the "significance of the period precisely lay in the polaristaion that developed between constitutional Labour politics of gradualist reform from above and the notion that the working class could achieve its goals through industrial militancy from below." Industrial militancy was a rejection of both parliament and "orthodox trade unionism".
But there were flaws in the struggle, and Darlington, as he has done in his other books, explores both the limits of radical trade unionism and the far-left political parties of the time. Notably he argues, "a characteristic feature of the radical left [at the time] was its failure to connect industrial struggles with political ideas, organisation and leadership". While the syndicalist trade unionists rightly "insisted that society's revolutionary transformation necessarily had to come from below" they also subordinated "ideological and political questions". This meant that at times struggles were weakened as for instance in the 1911 Liverpool transport strike, when "sectarianism between Catholic and Protestant workers was not explicitly challenged". Darlington concludes that these weaknesses meant:
The leadership vacuum was filled by default by trade union and Labour Party leaders, whose conciliatory and parliamentary reformist strategy of working within the system and accommodating to it ultimately predominated, notwithstanding considerable challenge.
Ralph Darlington's account of the Labour Revolt is an stimulating and important read. It is both inspiring and politically sharp. It reminds us of the power of workers when we act and demonstrate solidarity in practice, and of the need for clear trade union and socialist leadership. The potential demonstrated in 1910-1914 is desperately needed again, and this book is an excellent guide for learning from the past. While little known today 1910-1914 was an important era in shaping the trade union terrain on which we must organise today. All militants can learn a lot from this excellent book.
Related Reviews
Darlington & Lyddon - Glorious Summer: Class Struggle in Britain 1972
Darlington - Radical Unionism: The Rise and Fall of Revolutionary Syndicalism
Newsinger - Them and Us: Fighting the Class War 1910-1939
Cliff & Gluckstein - Marxism and Trade Union Struggle: The General Strike of 1926
No comments:
Post a Comment